Auto-renewals beat liability caps
A practical argument for focusing on the terms that actually create waste.
Read note →Focused review and negotiation for AI and SaaS companies buying software, services, data tools, and AI vendors. Customer contracts and outside-GC support are also available.
Vendor review usually means more than one PDF. The commercial risk often sits across the MSA, order form, DPA, support terms, AI terms, renewal language, and security-related contract commitments.
AI speeds up clause extraction, comparison, and first-pass drafting. Robin Moore owns the legal judgment, negotiation position, and client advice.
Share party names and a non-confidential summary before sending documents.
Low-risk contracts get a green light. Real issues get a targeted markup.
Comments focus on terms that change cost, risk, leverage, or operational burden.
When scoped, I work directly with the vendor and bring back a signable deal.
The $500 entry point is a triage product: read, summary, sign-or-flag. Redlines and direct vendor negotiation are scoped separately, with caps so the price stays predictable.
Sign, flag, or escalate recommendation; short written summary; no redline; ordinary SaaS or AI vendor terms.
Full markup of the MSA, order form, DPA, or AI vendor terms, with negotiation positions and one revision pass. Includes one round of vendor response.
Short vendor addendum that overrides the terms that matter, sent in lieu of round-by-round redlines. Direct vendor back-and-forth to acceptance.
Most contract fights are not worth the same attention. The work is deciding what actually changes expected value, velocity, customer trust, or operational load.
Auto-renewal, notice windows, minimum commitments, and renewal uplifts often matter more than heavily negotiated boilerplate.
AI and SaaS vendor terms need clear limits on training, retention, sharing, subprocessors, and contract-level security commitments.
Reporting duties, audit rights, support gaps, and termination mechanics can create real work for legal, security, finance, and procurement.
These pieces are sharper than normal law-firm content because they come from operating inside technology companies, not just reviewing contracts from the outside.
A practical argument for focusing on the terms that actually create waste.
Read note →A compact example of how much contract language can be removed when the deal is understood.
Read note →Privacy terms should be complete, readable, and useful to the teams that need to follow them.
Read note →AI can accelerate review, but the playbook, priorities, and legal judgment still matter.
Read note →